Support building for ban on red-light cameras

Critics say devices are a 'revenue grab' for cities and source of political corruption

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Print

By PETER HANCOCK

Capitol News Illinois

SPRINGFIELD – Bipartisan support appears to be building in the Illinois General Assembly for a statewide ban on red-light cameras.

Those are devices that some municipalities, like North Riverside and nearby Berwyn and Forest Park, install at intersections to detect drivers running through red lights or turning right without coming to a full stop.

Critics of those devices, however, argue they serve only to generate revenue and are a potential source of political corruption.

"Studies have shown that it does not improve safety. In fact, that it increases rear-end collisions," Rep. David McSweeney (R-Barrington Hills), said in an interview. "So this is really a revenue grab by local governments. And, as we've seen recently, this is obviously tied up, but likely with corruption."

McSweeney was referring to recent news reports indicating that one private company, SafeSpeed LLC, which supplies red-light cameras to several Chicago suburbs, including North Riverside and Berwyn, is the focus of a federal probe that led to raids on the offices and home of state Sen. Martin Sandoval, chairman of the powerful Senate Transportation Committee.

In early 2017, in a sweeping two-part report on red-light cameras and SafeSpeed LLC published by the Riverside-Brookfield Landmark, the newspaper reported that Sandoval had personally interceded, on SafeSpeed's behalf, with Illinois Department of Transportation officials to get approval for a red-light camera in Oakbrook Terrace while accepting tens of thousands of dollars in campaign donations from the company.

The village of North Riverside has collected more than $10 million from its two red-light cameras at the intersection of Harlem Avenue and Cermak Road since they were installed in 2014. The money is used to fund the village's police and fire pension obligations, and without that revenue would be hard pressed to come up with an alternative.

McSweeney has introduced several bills in recent years to ban the use of red-light cameras. One of those passed the House in 2015 but died in the Senate. Another one, House Bill 323, introduced in January, is still pending in the House, and last week it picked up two new Democratic co-sponsors, Reps. Rita Mayfield, of Waukegan, and Sam Yingling, of Grayslake.

And on Monday, Rep. Grant Wehrli (R-Naperville), introduced a virtually identical bill, House Bill 3909.

In a news release, Wehrli also claimed the devices are a source of political corruption.

"As the FBI's federal investigation into Senator Sandoval's shady dealings intensifies, it's time to re-examine the use of red-light cameras in Illinois and consider the type of ban he has repeatedly blocked," Wehrli said.

Sandoval, who has not been charged with any wrongdoing, did not respond to a request for comment.

McSweeney, meanwhile, said that even without the alleged corruption, he would still oppose the use of red-light cameras.

"My issue is that I think the red-light cameras, again, are designed for a specific purpose of raising revenue," he said. "Of course, if a policeman sees a person violating the law, that person should be ticketed, but it should be done like any other traffic violation, not through an automated system that is designed to produce revenue."

Bob Uphues contributed to this report.

Love the Landmark?

Become our partner in independent community journalism

Thanks for turning to Riverside Brookfield Landmark and RBLandmark.com. We love our thousands of digital-only readers. Now though we're asking you to partner up in paying for our reporters and photographers who report this news. It had to happen, right?

On the plus side, we're giving you a simple way, and a better reason, to join in. We're now a non-profit -- Growing Community Media -- so your donation is tax deductible. And signing up for a monthly donation, or making a one-time donation, is fast and easy.

No threats from us. The news will be here. No paywalls or article countdowns. We're counting on an exquisite mix of civic enlightenment and mild shaming. Sort of like public radio.

Claim your bragging rights. Become a digital member.

Donate Now

Reader Comments

2 Comments - Add Your Comment

Note: This page requires you to login with Facebook to comment.

Comment Policy

Diana Short from Oakbrook Il  

Posted: October 11th, 2019 8:12 AM

I totally agree the cameras are for revenue and don't understand why the cities take advantage of mid or low class people increasing salaries as our expenses are going up and it's getting harder to afford life while the politicians are are taking in millions of money lies about they care for their people.They don't. I respect firemen for the jobs they do and the police but don't we need respect too.we work all our lives and live on low income when we retire.our salaries don't go up. Start controlling the money better and stop being selfish.

John Chauvet from North Riverside  

Posted: October 10th, 2019 1:50 AM

Or... You could just stop at the red light...

Facebook Connect

Quick Links

Sign-up to get the latest news updates for Riverside and Brookfield.


            
SubscribeClassified
MultimediaContact us
Submit Letter To The Editor
Place a Classified Ad